Track Record

An overview of some of our notable cases and judgments. We are known for our decisive approach and excellent results for our clients.

Filter by practice area:

Curator realises sale of BNI assets to maximise recovery for creditors

In November 2023, Sander was appointed bankruptcy trustee in the insolvency of BN International B.V. Until its bankruptcy, BNI was one of Europe’s largest wallpaper manufacturers, with a turnover of around €64 million and 121 employees. In order to realise as much value as possible for the creditors, Sander sold BNI’s land, factory buildings and production lines.

Appointment as trustee
Judgment

Contractor liable for defect in newly built home: repair required

Marco successfully represented the purchaser of a newly built home in a dispute with the contractor about whether the home had a defect for which the contractor and builder were liable. The district court answered that question in the affirmative, obliging the contractor to repair the defect in the purchasers’ home.

Contractor liabilityDefect in constructed home

Injunction prevents forced home sale; owner granted more time for financing

Denise prevented a house from being auctioned due to mortgage arrears. She initiated summary proceedings to compel the bank to cancel the auction on the grounds that proceeding with the sale would be unacceptable according to standards of reasonableness and fairness and contrary to the bank’s duty of care. A settlement was reached at the hearing, giving the homeowner more time to arrange financing.

Judgment

Steinhoff WHOA plan confirmed: €10.4 billion restructured

Onno and Sander acted for the German investors’ association SdK (Schutzgemeinschaft der Kapitalanleger e.V.). In the public WHOA proceedings of Steinhoff International Holdings N.V., the Amsterdam District Court confirmed the plan on 21 June 2023. The case involved approximately €10.4 billion in debt and was one of the largest WHOA restructuring cases to date.

Judgment

Easement revived by prescription: court confirms existence of right

Denise won a case about easements that had lapsed due to land consolidation but re-arose through prescription. The Amsterdam District Court held that the claimant’s legal predecessors had used the path for more than 10 years as if there was an easement. Because they were also in good faith, the easements had been re-established.

Article

Successful complaint to the Press Council on behalf of eDreams

On behalf of online travel agency eDreams, Thomas successfully filed a complaint against the editor-in-chief of broadcaster Omroep MAX with the Press Council.

Complaint to the Press Council
Judgment

Purchase-option dispute: €187,550 repayment ordered

Xagan represented a company in a dispute concerning an option to purchase a commercial property. The Zeeland-West-Brabant District Court held that the seller could no longer perform its obligations under the option agreement after selling the property to a third party. The court rescinded the option agreement and ordered the seller to refund the option fees already paid, totalling €187,550.

Franchisee liable for breach of non-compete and must transfer domain names

Sander successfully represented a franchisor in a dispute with a franchisee. At the franchisor’s request, the franchisee was ordered to pay damages for breaching a non-compete clause and to transfer domain names to the franchisor.

Judgment

Court dismisses directors and holds them personally liable for improper withdrawals

Onno successfully represented a foundation that wanted to dismiss two of its directors. In the final judgment, the court held that the dismissed directors were personally liable for improper withdrawals.

Dismissal of foundation directors
Judgment

Court: association’s termination valid; claims dismissed

In this case, AMS Advocaten represented an association that had terminated a member’s membership. The issue was whether the board had validly terminated the membership on the grounds that the member’s continued membership could no longer reasonably be required. The district court held that the board had sufficiently observed the principles of hearing and rebuttal, that termination – rather than expulsion – was the appropriate route, and that the board had reasonably acted within its policy discretion. The claims for annulment of the decision were dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay the costs.

Page 7 of 13 (122 track records)

Do you need legal assistance?

Contact one of our specialists.

Contact us