Track record

Onno successfully claimed access to sales figures on behalf of his client, based on an agreement entitling the client to 8% of the gross margin on COVID-19 tests sold by the parties.

Onno successfully represented a foundation in proceedings in which a third party claimed to have lent substantial sums to the foundation. The district court ultimately allowed only a small part of the claim.

Thomas obtained a rectification of an article in the Leeuwarder Courant that had damaged his client’s reputation.

On behalf of a Danish client, Lennard requested recognition in the Netherlands of a foreign arbitral award under the New York Convention for an amount of €1 million and permission to enforce that award in the Netherlands. The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal granted the request. It held that there was no conflict with Dutch public policy, recognised the arbitral award, granted leave for enforcement in the Netherlands and ordered the opposing party to pay €11,000 in legal costs.

In this case, AMS represented an association that had terminated a member’s membership. The member contested the termination. The articles of association provided for an internal appeal in case of termination. Because the member wished to appeal but the board refused to convene the required general meeting, the board’s termination decision was held to be contrary to the reasonableness and fairness required by Article 2:8 Dutch Civil Code.

The claimants sought an order that the defendant, represented by Denise, lift all conservatory attachments on the grounds of, among other things, breach of the duty of truth under Article 21 CCP. The defendant successfully contested this; only part of the attachments was lifted because that part turned out not to be necessary.

In this case, the contractor claimed that the clients represented by Denise had to pay more than € 55,000 extra because the contractor claimed to have incurred those costs on a cost-plus basis. The clients disputed that arrangement and that they owed more than the fixed contract price. The court held that the contractor had insufficiently substantiated that the clients owed him more.

AMS successfully represented a client in proceedings about alleged transgressive behaviour at a student association. In proceedings on the merits, the decision to expel the client from membership was annulled due to breach of the right to be heard and lack of factual basis; the court ordered a rectification and declared that the allegations constituted an unlawful act.

In an arbitration concerning a home warranty dispute, Rosa represented two private clients in a dispute with their contractor. The arbitrator awarded fixed damages for construction delay. In addition, several defects were established that the contractor had to remedy. For defects that had already been repaired by third parties without giving the contractor the opportunity to do so himself, the arbitrator awarded compensation based on the contractor’s saved costs.

Together with a colleague, Lennard represented a client on appeal who had held a lawyer liable for professional negligence. The Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court of Appeal held that the lawyer should have pointed out the short limitation period for penalties and was responsible for enforcement of the judgments. The lawyer therefore had to compensate the client’s loss, which the court assessed at €15,000.