Track record

Marco acted for a client who was confronted with additional work invoices. The district court held that there was no valid additional work and dismissed the claims.

Lennard represented a shareholder of a healthcare company. On behalf of the client, he petitioned the Enterprise Chamber to order an inquiry. The Enterprise Chamber found there were well-founded reasons to doubt the soundness of the company’s policy and course of affairs, justifying an investigation, and appointed a director with a casting vote.

Lennard represented a shareholder of a healthcare company. On behalf of the client, he petitioned the Enterprise Chamber to order an inquiry. The Enterprise Chamber found there were well-founded reasons to doubt the soundness of policy and the course of affairs, justifying an investigation. This was due, among other things, to the transfer of staff by the director, declining profits and transactions in which the director had a conflict of interest.

Lennard assisted a client against whom an evidence seizure had been levied. The request to inspect the seized information was fully rejected because there was an insufficient link between the claim for which the seizure had been granted and the legal basis of the disclosure claim.

Marco successfully obtained conservatory attachments for a contractor in a dispute with its client, who had failed to pay the contractor’s invoices. The client sought to have the attachments lifted in summary proceedings, but that claim was dismissed.

Thomas won summary proceedings brought by CBRE against his client, an Amsterdam retailer. CBRE sought eviction, claiming that the lease had ended and that it urgently needed the premises for its own use due to a shopping centre renovation. The preliminary relief judge of the Amsterdam District Court dismissed the claims and ordered CBRE to pay the legal costs.

Lennard conducted summary proceedings for a Danish client. The court ordered the defendant to disclose her sources of income and assets by, among other things, providing insight into her bank statements, debtors and other income in the Netherlands and abroad.

Lennard represented a Belgian director in a director’s liability case before the Rotterdam District Court, in which he was being held liable for €300,000. All claims against the director were dismissed because it had not been established that he could personally be seriously blamed. The opposing party was ordered to pay €8,000 in legal costs.

Onno successfully claimed access to sales figures on behalf of his client, based on an agreement entitling the client to 8% of the gross margin on COVID-19 tests sold by the parties.

Onno successfully represented a foundation in proceedings in which a third party claimed to have lent substantial sums to the foundation. The district court ultimately allowed only a small part of the claim.